A couple of questions concerning canon
Jan. 5th, 2004 11:45 pmI've checked All Things Philosophical and
peasant_'s The Gate but can find nothing to definitively answer a couple of questions. Depending on the answers, I may have to rewrite a key passage or two of the long fic I'm working on. Is anyone able to help?
Did Spike's chip prevent him from injuring or attacking nonhuman animals?
As far as I can tell, all the evidence is equivocal.
(i) Shortly after the chipping, he turns up starving on Giles' doorstep. There's no evidence that he's tried and failed to eat the local domestic animals but there's no sign that he's not tried to.
(ii) Harmony at one point claims that Spike can't even pick flowers, but I am inclined to dismiss this on the grounds that (a) it's Harmony, (b) Spike begs to differ and most importantly, (c) Spike turns up with some wildflowers for Joyce on her death and he presumably picked these himself.
(iii) Spike plays for kittens in poker, but it's unclear whether he eats them or simply uses them as currency.
(iv) Riley says at one point that Spike can't injure any living thing, but see (ii). Also, it's hard to see why this would benefit the Initiative and we don't know if the chip worked exactly as expected.
Can vampires choose not to breathe?
We know that vampires don't need to breathe in the sense that they have no need of oxygen; this was demonstrated early on when Angel was able to turn off the gas in the high school basement. Also, Angel clearly wouldn't have survived his later undersea adventure otherwise. Vamps talk, smoke and pant so they do use their lungs on a daily basis. But can they choose to suppress the urge to breathe? This is what I am not sure about. When The First tortured Spike by dunking him underwater, did this in fact provide us with a demonstration that vampires retain the urge to breath even though they don't need air?
Did Spike's chip prevent him from injuring or attacking nonhuman animals?
As far as I can tell, all the evidence is equivocal.
(i) Shortly after the chipping, he turns up starving on Giles' doorstep. There's no evidence that he's tried and failed to eat the local domestic animals but there's no sign that he's not tried to.
(ii) Harmony at one point claims that Spike can't even pick flowers, but I am inclined to dismiss this on the grounds that (a) it's Harmony, (b) Spike begs to differ and most importantly, (c) Spike turns up with some wildflowers for Joyce on her death and he presumably picked these himself.
(iii) Spike plays for kittens in poker, but it's unclear whether he eats them or simply uses them as currency.
(iv) Riley says at one point that Spike can't injure any living thing, but see (ii). Also, it's hard to see why this would benefit the Initiative and we don't know if the chip worked exactly as expected.
Can vampires choose not to breathe?
We know that vampires don't need to breathe in the sense that they have no need of oxygen; this was demonstrated early on when Angel was able to turn off the gas in the high school basement. Also, Angel clearly wouldn't have survived his later undersea adventure otherwise. Vamps talk, smoke and pant so they do use their lungs on a daily basis. But can they choose to suppress the urge to breathe? This is what I am not sure about. When The First tortured Spike by dunking him underwater, did this in fact provide us with a demonstration that vampires retain the urge to breath even though they don't need air?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:58 am (UTC)I don't know why but I've always seen the Jossverse as having a very anthropomorphic viewpoint, to the extent that living things are almost equated exclusively with humans. The rest of carbon-based organisms (sentient or not) are fodder. Even season 7 Willow harking on the connectedness of things (somewhat an echo of the rhetoric of the environmental movement) or Tara portrayed as "mother earthy" are not enough to convince me that the Jossverse does not privilege human life above all other forms of non-demonic life. Not a problem for me since I watched Buffy for the slayers and the monsters, and not for the flowers and the amoeba.:-)
As for vampires choosing not to breathe, Angel's underwater entrapment is a good argument for this.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 06:07 am (UTC)Yes, of course, I knew I was missing somthing obvious. How else would he have survived?
As for vampires choosing not to breathe, Angel's underwater entrapment is a good argument for this.
He could still have been breathing, though, just taking in the same stale air over and over.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 10:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 08:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 10:02 am (UTC)There have been several occasions when Angel has chosen not to breathe for longer than a human could easily do so--once in an early BtVS episode where he goes and rescues Buffy from a gas-filled school basement, and a S4 AtS episode where he's in a gas-filled elevator. (I think it's the one introducing Gwen Raiden.)
I think it's likely that the urge to breathe is something that varies in intensity from vampire to vampire, and which may decrease with age. Spike, as a very 'human' vamp, may have a harder time suppressing it than Angel does. I've postuated that for Spike, at least, breathing is a stress reaction--he gets upset, he tends to start breathing heavily. So the drowning thing was a vicious circle; the more uncomfortable he was, the more he wanted to breathe, which made him even more uncomfortable...
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 11:32 am (UTC)Chiming in late
Date: 2004-01-31 08:49 am (UTC)theorized that vamps have to use their breath to speak,
but I'm not educated in the physiology.